5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Moore.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Moore Anchor | green | “to show identity, guilty knowledge, intent, motive, to rebut a defense of mistake or accident, or to establish some other relevant issue.” | 12 |
| 2 | Spicer v. State | green | “analysis on the basis of the evidence adduced at the defendant's trial instead of only the evidence adduced at the hearing” | 6 |
| 3 | State v. Garrett | green | “a question of evidentiary relevance.” | 5 |
| 4 | State v. Garrett | green | “a trial court abuses its discretion when it applies incorrect legal standards, reaches an illogical conclusion, bases its ruling on a clearly erroneous assessment of the proof, or applies reasoning that causes an injustice to the complaining party.” | 5 |
| 5 | State v. Garrett | green | “identity (including motive and common scheme or plan), intent, or rebuttal of accident or mistake.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.