5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bigpond v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bigpond v. State Anchor | green | “we review questions of statutory interpretation de novo.” | 7 |
| 2 | State, Department of Motor Vehicles v. Vezeris | green | “duty to construe that statute in line with what reason and public policy would indicate the legislature intended.” | 6 |
| 3 | State, Bus. & Indus. v. Granite Constr. Co. | green | “however, if a statute is susceptible to more than one natural or honest interpretation, it is ambiguous, and the plain meaning rule has no application.” | 6 |
| 4 | Allred v. State | green | “this court will refrain from interfering with the sentence imposed slo long as the record does not demonstrate prejudice resulting from consideration of information or accusations founded on facts supported only by impalpable or highly suspect evidence.” | 6 |
| 5 | Attaguile v. State | green | “nrs 458.300 plainly and unambiguously provides that a defendant may elect treatment before sentencing.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.