2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hessmer v. Hessmer.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hessmer v. Hessmer Anchor | green | “while entitled to fair and equal treatment before the courts, a pro se litigant is still required to comply with substantive and procedural law as do parties represented by counsel.” | 23 |
| 2 | Hawkins v. Hart | green | “in order for an issue to be considered on appeal, a party must, in his brief, develop the theories or contain authority to support the averred position as required by tennessee rules of appellate procedure 27(a).” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.