5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Reyna v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reyna v. State Anchor | green | “an objection on hearsay does not preserve error on confrontation clause grounds.” | 19 |
| 2 | Oveal v. State | green | “had to calm her down to find out, you know, where the actor might be at.” | 3 |
| 3 | Lollis v. State | green | “the timing, purpose, and setting of a challenged statement can be relevant considerations when determining whether the statement's primary purpose is testimonial.” | 3 |
| 4 | Liggens v. State | green | “cedric james was the one that assaulted her,” | 3 |
| 5 | Evans v. State | green | “resulted from impulse rather than reason and reflection.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.