7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State of Maine v. Karl Maine.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State of Maine v. Karl Maine Anchor | green | “we review a trial court's rulings on relevance for clear error, and rulings on admissibility for an abuse of discretion.” | 6 |
| 2 | State of Maine v. Raymond N. Rourke III | green | “viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the state, the jury could rationally have found the following facts beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 5 |
| 3 | State v. Richford | green | “the degree of impairment he would have suffered given that range” | 4 |
| 4 | State v. Grigsby | green | “if a person has an alcohol level of 0.05 grams or less of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or 210 liters of breath, it is prima facie evidence that that person is not under the influence of alcohol.” | 4 |
| 5 | State v. Grigsby | green | “it would confuse the issues in the case,” | 4 |
| 6 | State of Maine v. Bradley R. Atkins | green | “a person is under the influence if the person's physical or mental faculties are impaired however slightly or to any extent by the substance or substances that the person consumed.” | 4 |
| 7 | State of Maine v. Bradley R. Atkins | green | “if a person has an alcohol level of 0.05 grams or less of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or 210 liters of breath, it is prima facie evidence that that person is not under the influence of alcohol.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.