4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Burkhart.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Burkhart Anchor | green | “due process requires that a statute provide 'fair warning' and prohibits holding an individual criminally liable for conduct that a person of common intelligence would not have reasonably understood to be proscribed.” | 10 |
| 2 | State v. Wilkins | red | “absolute precision in drafting prohibitory legislation is not required since prosecution could then easily be evaded by schemes and devices.” | 7 |
| 3 | State v. Wilkins | red | “which by orderly processes of litigation can be rendered sufficiently definite and certain for purposes of judicial decision.” | 7 |
| 4 | State v. Thomas | green | “sufficiently precise to put an individual on notice of prohibited activities.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.