Topic: to foreclose access to social media altogether is to preven… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #12499

6 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Packingham v. North Carolina.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Packingham v. North Carolina Anchor
scotus · 2017
green “to foreclose access to social media altogether is to prevent the user from engaging in the legitimate exercise of first amendment rights.” 16
2 People v. Moss
ill · 2005
green “do not present a threat to the safety and security of a community.” 3
3 People v. Moss
ill · 2005
green “has stated generally that probationers and parolees share the same status for fourth amendment purposes.” 3
4 People v. Morger
ill · 2019
green “prohibits constitutionally protected activity as well as activity that may be prohibited without offending constitutional rights.” 3
5 People v. Morger
ill · 2019
green “unnecessarily sweeps within its purview those who never used the internet-much less social media-to commit their offenses and who show no propensity to do so, as well as those whose internet activities can be supervised and monitored by less restrictive means.” 3
6 People v. Morger
ill · 2019
green “a substantial number of the statute's applications are unconstitutional, judged in relation to its legitimate sweep.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check