3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. Aragon.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. Aragon Anchor | green | “a reviewing court usurps the agency's function when it sets aside the administrative determination upon a ground not theretofore presented and deprives the of an opportunity to consider the matter, make its ruling, and state the reasons for its action.” | 12 |
| 2 | Rhone Poulenc S.A. v. United States | green | “it appears that it would have been futile for plaintiffs to argue that the agency should not apply its own regulation” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.