7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Marshall.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Marshall Anchor | green | “authorizes a trial court to order the taking, analysis and indexing of a qualifying offender's dna, and the payment of the analysis fee only where that defendant is not currently registered in the dna database.” | 8 |
| 2 | People v. Williams | green | “the date a defendant is sentenced and committed to the department of corrections is to be counted as a day of sentence and not as a day of presentence credit” | 4 |
| 3 | People v. Unander | green | “although the drug court assessment pursuant to section 5-1101(f) of the counties code is labeled a fee, it is actually a fine where, as here, defendant did not participate in drug court.” | 4 |
| 4 | People v. Folks | green | “comprehensive legislative revision in the assessment of fines, fees, costs and the 5-per-day credit for time spent in custody prior to sentencing.” | 4 |
| 5 | People v. Wynn | green | “the charge is used to expunge juvenile records and is in no way related to the prosecution of the adult defendant against whom the charge is levied.” | 4 |
| 6 | People v. Guadarrama | green | “the fee is used to cover the costs incurred in collecting and testing a dna sample that is taken from a defendant convicted of a qualifying offense” | 4 |
| 7 | People v. Marshall | green | “section 5-4-3 authorizes a trial court to order the taking, analysis and indexing of a qualifying offender's dna, and the payment of the analysis fee only where that defendant is not currently registered in the dna database.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.