Topic: a gender-based classification favoring one sex can be justi… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #12625

8 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan Anchor
scotus · 1982
green “a gender-based classification favoring one sex can be justified if it intentionally and directly assists members of the sex that is disproportionately burdened.” 7
2 William M. Kelley, Joseph S. Rossi, Robert E. Sims v. Board of Trustees, University of Illinois, Morton W. Weir, Ronald E. Guenther
ca7 · 1994
green “congress itself recognized that addressing discrimination in athletics presented a unique set of problems not raised in areas such as employment and academics.” 4
3 William M. Kelley, Joseph S. Rossi, Robert E. Sims v. Board of Trustees, University of Illinois, Morton W. Weir, Ronald E. Guenther
ca7 · 1994
green “ensuring that in instances where overall athletic opportunities decrease, the actual opportunities available to the underrepresented gender do not.” 4
4 Sarah Anne Williams Wayne Williams, on Behalf of Their Minor Son, John Williams v. The School District of Bethlehem, Pa
ca3 · 1993
green “it would require blinders to ignore that the motivation for promulgation of the regulation on athletics was the historic emphasis on boys' athletic programs to the exclusion of girls' athletic programs in high schools as well as colleges” 3
5 William M. Kelley, Joseph S. Rossi, Robert E. Sims v. Board of Trustees, University of Illinois, Morton W. Weir, Ronald E. Guenther
ca7 · 1994
green “rather, the policy interpretation merely creates a presumption that a school is in compliance with title ix and the applicable regulation when it achieves such a statistical balance.” 3
6 Commercial Union Insurance Company v. Walbrook Insurance Co., Ltd., Commercial Union Insurance Company v. National Casualty Co.
ca1 · 1994
green “constitutes the law of the case on such issues of law as were actually considered and decided by the appellate court, or as were necessarily inferred from the disposition on appeal.” 3
7 Gail Merchant Irving v. United States
ca1 · 1995
green “intervening controlling authority exception” 3
8 Cohen v. Brown University
rid · 1995
green “the concept of any measure of unfilled but available athletic slots does not comport with reality.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check