3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jamie Viqueira v. First Bank.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jamie Viqueira v. First Bank Anchor | green | “must construe the complaint liberally, treating all well-pleaded facts as true and drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiffs.” | 21 |
| 2 | Vaquería Tres Monjitas, Inc. v. Irizarry | green | “the measure of irreparable harm is not a rigid one; it has been referred to as a sliding scale, working in conjunction with a moving party's likelihood of success on the merits.” | 5 |
| 3 | In Re Advisory Opinion to the Governor | green | “the commission's licensing rules and regulations had to conform to the same restrictions in the statute.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.