2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Calero-Cerezo v. United States Department of Justice.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Calero-Cerezo v. United States Department of Justice Anchor | green | “is one that could be resolved in favor of either party.” | 24 |
| 2 | Medina-Rodriguez v. Fernandez Bakery, Inc. | green | “must demonstrate that (1) he or she has a qualified disability under the ada, (2) the defendant operates a place of public accommodation, and (3) the plaintiff was discriminated against as a result of his or her disability.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.