3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Vineberg v. Bissonnette.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vineberg v. Bissonnette Anchor | green | “a fact is material only if it possesses the capacity to sway the outcome of the litigation under the applicable law.” | 14 |
| 2 | Meuser v. Federal Express Corp. | green | “a genuine issue exists where a reasonable jury could resolve the point in favor of the nonmoving party.” | 11 |
| 3 | Packgen v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. | green | “a party cannot survive summary judgment simply by articulating conclusions the jury might imaginably reach; it must point to evidence that would support those conclusions.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.