3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Luise Light v. Isabel Wolf.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Luise Light v. Isabel Wolf Anchor | green | “the party on whose behalf service is made has the burden of establishing its validity when challenged; to do so, he must demonstrate that the procedure employed satisfied the requirements of the relevant portions of federal rule of civil procedure 4 and any other applicable prov…” | 13 |
| 2 | Hilska v. Jones | green | “if the plaintiff does not properly effect service on a defendant, then the defendant may move to dismiss the complaint” | 11 |
| 3 | Brian P. Moore v. Agency for International Development | green | “pro se litigants are allowed more latitude than litigants represented by counsel to correct defects in service of process and pleadings,” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.