5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United Industries Corp. v. Clorox Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United Industries Corp. v. Clorox Co. Anchor | green | “a district court has broad discretion when ruling on requests for preliminary injunctions, and we will reverse only for clearly erroneous factual determinations, an error of law, or an abuse of that discretion.” | 11 |
| 2 | Sanborn Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Campbell Hausfeld/scott Fetzer Company | green | “(1) the probability of success on the merits; (2) the threat of irreparable harm to the movant; (3) the balance between this harm and the injury that granting the injunction will inflict on other interested parties; and (4) whether the issuance of an injunction is in the public …” | 10 |
| 3 | Oklahoma Disability Law Center, Inc. v. Dillon Family & Youth Services, Inc. | green | “paimi imposes a duty of confidentiality on the advocacy organizations.” | 3 |
| 4 | Iowa Protection & Advocacy Services, Inc. v. Gerard Treatment Programs, L.L.C. | green | “thus, to warrant a preliminary injunction, the moving party must demonstrate a sufficient threat of irreparable harm.” | 3 |
| 5 | Guzzino v. Felterman | green | “in anticipation of a federal agency's investigation” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.