3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 205 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Eleuterio MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eleuterio MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee Anchor | green | “both the evidence that supports and detracts from the commissioner's conclusions.” | 94 |
| 2 | William P. Flake v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare | green | “the decision should be set aside if the proper legal standards were not applied in weighing the evidence and making the decision.” | 71 |
| 3 | James L. Batson, Sr. v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration | green | “substantial evidence' means 'more than a mere scintilla but less than a preponderance,' or more clearly stated, 'such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” | 40 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.