6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Thran v. First Judicial District Court.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thran v. First Judicial District Court Anchor | green | “is clear and unambiguous and requires no construction other than its own language.” | 5 |
| 2 | Massey v. Sunrise Hospital | green | “rule 41(e) accomplishes this end by requiring counsel's diligence in pursuing claims.” | 5 |
| 3 | Edwards v. Ghandour | red | “did not take appropriate action to move his case forward and set aside the stay” | 5 |
| 4 | Boren v. City of North Las Vegas | green | “had some kind of duty of diligence in seeking vacation of the stay order and to bring the case to trial.” | 5 |
| 5 | Boren v. City of North Las Vegas | green | “the parties are prevented from bringing an action to trial by reason of a stay order.” | 5 |
| 6 | Boren v. City of North Las Vegas | green | “we would be hard-pressed to formulate a rule describing the degree of diligence required under such circumstances.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.