7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Marriage of LaMusga.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Marriage of LaMusga Anchor | green | “the children's interest in stability and continuity in the custodial arrangement; the distance of the move; the age of the children; the children's relationship with both parents; the relationship between the parents including, but not limited to, their ability to communicate an…” | 5 |
| 2 | In Re Marriage of LaMusga | green | “the reasons for the proposed move” | 5 |
| 3 | In Re Marriage of Condon | green | “whether or not the move-away parent has the funds to post a substantial bond,” | 4 |
| 4 | Abargil v. Abargil | green | “best serve joey's interest in becoming a well-educated and competent adult.” | 4 |
| 5 | Abargil v. Abargil | green | “the judgment had teeth to compel her adherence because it required her to post a bond or other surety to ensure her compliance,” | 4 |
| 6 | Heath v. Heath | green | “speculation by lawyers, conflicting argument on behalf of parents, and 'hunches' of judges.” | 4 |
| 7 | F.T. v. L.J. | green | “misunderstanding and/or avoiding the fundamental question before it.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.