4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Cunningham.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Cunningham Anchor | red | “courts may impose costs in criminal cases only where such costs are authorized by statute.” | 11 |
| 2 | People v. Konopka (On Remand) | green | “without a factual basis for the costs imposed, we cannot determine whether the costs imposed were reasonably related to the actual costs incurred by the trial court, as required by mcl 769.1k(1)(b)(iii).” | 11 |
| 3 | People v. Konopka (On Remand) | green | “establish a factual basis' from which this court can 'determine whether the costs imposed were reasonably related to the actual costs incurred by the trial court.” | 5 |
| 4 | People v. Konopka (On Remand) | green | “reasonably related to the actual costs incurred by the trial court.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.