3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from David Engler v. David Arnold.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | David Engler v. David Arnold Anchor | green | “mere labels and conclusions are not enough.” | 14 |
| 2 | David Engler v. David Arnold | green | “allow the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged” | 9 |
| 3 | Joe Solo v. United Parcel Service Co. | green | “sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.