5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re Logan M..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re Logan M. Anchor | green | “for an abuse of discretion, viewing the facts, and the weight to be given them, through the trial court's lens,” | 15 |
| 2 | In re Magdalena F. | neutral | “because the department's compliance with its reunification duties prescribed in 22 m.r.s. 4041(1-a) is not a discrete element of proof in a termination proceeding, any failure of the department to comply with those duties does not preclude a finding of parental unfitness.” | 4 |
| 3 | In re Caleb M. | green | “due process requires: notice of the issues, an opportunity to be heard, the right to introduce evidence and present witnesses, the right to respond to claims and evidence, and an impartial fact-finder.” | 4 |
| 4 | Joyce E. Mitchell v. Alexander S. Krieckhaus | green | “heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner,” | 4 |
| 5 | Selcuk Karamanoglu v. Catherine (Karamanoglu) Gourlaouen | green | “the deficiencies ... did not affect the result in this case” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.