3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Strother v. Hutchinson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Strother v. Hutchinson Anchor | green | “in order to establish actionable negligence, one seeking recovery must show the existence of a duty, the breach of the duty, and injury resulting proximately therefrom.” | 22 |
| 2 | Uhl v. Thomas, Ca2008-06-131 (1-20-2009) | green | “invitee may not reasonably be expected to protect himself from a risk he cannot fully appreciate.” | 5 |
| 3 | McConnell v. Margello, 06ap-1235 (9-20-2007) | green | “attendant circumstances do not include the individual's activity at the time of the fall unless the individual's attention was diverted by an unusual circumstance of the property owner's making.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.