5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from First National Bank v. O'Brien (In re O'Brien).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | First National Bank v. O'Brien (In re O'Brien) Anchor | green | “largely a question of foreseeability.” | 8 |
| 2 | State of Tex. v. American Tobacco Co. | green | “if the evidence shows that the loss was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the plaintiff's reliance.” | 7 |
| 3 | Manheim Automotive Financial v. Hurst | green | “the greater the distance between the reliance claimed and the limits of the reasonable, the greater the doubt about reliance in fact.” | 5 |
| 4 | Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. Perry (In Re Perry) | green | “willful blindness' does not provide a defense to an action brought under 523(a)(2)(a) and may instead be used as a factor indicative of fraud.” | 5 |
| 5 | Mid-S. Maint., Inc. v. Burk (In re Burk) | green | “a debtor who recklessly disregards the truth has the requisite wrongful intent for his actions to constitute actual fraud.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.