5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jordan v. De George.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jordan v. De George Anchor | green | “crime involving moral turpitude” | 20 |
| 2 | Nir Goldeshtein v. Immigration and Naturalization Service | green | “a crime that does not necessarily involve evil intent, such as intent to defraud, is not necessarily a crime involving moral turpitude.” | 3 |
| 3 | Nir Goldeshtein v. Immigration and Naturalization Service | green | “crime involving moral turpitude” | 2 |
| 4 | MEDINA | green | “crime involving moral turpitude” | 2 |
| 5 | MEDINA | green | “evil intent' is a requisite element for a crime involving moral turpitude,” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.