3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Peguero v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Peguero v. United States Anchor | green | “when counsel fails to file a requested appeal, a defendant is entitled to a new appeal without showing that his appeal would likely have had merit” | 11 |
| 2 | Rodriquez v. United States | green | “when counsel fails to file a requested appeal, a defendant is entitled to a new appeal without showing that his appeal would likely have had merit” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.