4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from National Audubon Society v. Hoffman.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | National Audubon Society v. Hoffman Anchor | green | “generally, a court reviewing an agency decision is confined to the administrative record compiled by that agency when it made the decision.” | 20 |
| 2 | National Audubon Society v. Hoffman | green | “a court reviewing an agency decision is confined to the administrative record compiled by that agency when it made the decision.” | 3 |
| 3 | Karpova v. Snow | green | “set out a satisfactory explanation including a rational connection between the facts found and the choice made.” | 3 |
| 4 | Islander East Pipeline Co., LLC v. McCarthy | green | “substitute its judgment for that of the agency.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.