2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from George Morgan v. Alberto R. Gonzales, United States Attorney General, Department of Homeland Security.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | George Morgan v. Alberto R. Gonzales, United States Attorney General, Department of Homeland Security Anchor | green | “under a highly deferential standard of abuse of discretion.” | 26 |
| 2 | SIBRUN | green | “materially affected the outcome of his case.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.