Topic: if a finding of preclusion could foreclose all meaningful j… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #13368

7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Center for Food Safety v. Jewell.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Center for Food Safety v. Jewell Anchor
cadc · 2015
green “if a finding of preclusion could foreclose all meaningful judicial review; if the suit is wholly collateral to a statute's review provisions; and if the claims are outside the agency's expertise.” 5
2 American Federation of Government Employees v. Secretary of the Air Force
cadc · 2013
green “plaintiffs are masters of their complaints” 4
3 American Federation of Government Employees v. Secretary of the Air Force
cadc · 2013
green “to wear military uniforms while performing civilian duties.” 4
4 Arch Coal, Inc. v. R. Alexander Acosta
cadc · 2018
green “alter the rights or interests of parties.” 4
5 Arch Coal, Inc. v. R. Alexander Acosta
cadc · 2018
green “implicitly precludes district court jurisdiction over the claims” 4
6 Arch Coal, Inc. v. R. Alexander Acosta
cadc · 2018
green “it is quite different to suggest, as appellant does, that a detailed scheme of administrative adjudication impliedly precludes preenforcement judicial review of rules.” 4
7 Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. Trump
cadc · 2018
green “assuming that some universe of viable” 4

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check