5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 200 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from George McReynolds v. Merrill Lynch.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | George McReynolds v. Merrill Lynch Anchor | green | “allegations in the form of legal conclusions are insufficient to survive a rule 12(b)(6) motion.” | 83 |
| 2 | Lavalais v. Village of Melrose Park | green | “all well-pleaded factual allegations as true and views them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.” | 41 |
| 3 | Tamayo v. Blagojevich | green | “accepts as true all well-pleaded facts alleged” | 33 |
| 4 | Lavalais v. Village of Melrose Park | green | “in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.” | 24 |
| 5 | Lavalais v. Village of Melrose Park | green | “all well- pleaded factual allegations as true and views them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.” | 19 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.