4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dove v. Gold Kist, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dove v. Gold Kist, Inc. Anchor | green | “subject matter jurisdiction is 'the power to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings in question belong.” | 15 |
| 2 | Dove v. Gold Kist, Inc. | green | “power to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings in question belong.” | 6 |
| 3 | Dove v. Gold Kist, Inc. | green | “subject matter jurisdiction is the power to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings in question belong.” | 5 |
| 4 | Gainey v. Gainey | green | “numerous cases have held that subject matter jurisdiction is not implicated when the court possesses the power to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings in question belong.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.