6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from County of Cameron v. Brown.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | County of Cameron v. Brown Anchor | green | “in deciding a plea to the jurisdiction, a court may not weigh the claims' merits but must consider only the plaintiffs' pleadings and the evidence pertinent to the jurisdictional inquiry.” | 12 |
| 2 | Tara Partners, Ltd. v. City of South Houston | green | “that the payments were made as a result of fraud, mutual mistake of fact, or duress, whether express or implied.” | 5 |
| 3 | MHCB (USA) Leasing & Finance Corp. v. Galveston Central Appraisal District | green | “only a determination of whether the district and board acted without authority in their respective actions” | 3 |
| 4 | Tara Partners, Ltd. v. City of South Houston | green | “who made any full or partial payments of the illegal bills sent out by larry hammond did so under duress.” | 3 |
| 5 | Strayhorn v. Lexington Insurance Co. | green | “the purposes underlying the exhaustion rule are not applicable: judicial and administrative efficiency are not served, and agency policies and expertise are irrelevant, if the agency's final action will be a nullity.” | 3 |
| 6 | Lowell v. City of Baytown | green | “appellants' request for an injunction requiring the city to comply with section 143.041 in the future is not barred by governmental immunity” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.