Topic: the implication that the contract applies to third parties … · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #13541

9 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Marque Medicos Archer, LLC v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Marque Medicos Archer, LLC v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Anchor
illappct · 2018
green “the implication that the contract applies to third parties must be so strong as to be practically an express declaration.” 5
2 Rogalla v. Christie Clinic, P.C.
illappct · 2003
green “christie clinic and personalcare shall have the right to seek to recover charges incurred as a result of providing medical/hospital services which are the liability of a third party.” 3
3 Rogalla v. Christie Clinic, P.C.
illappct · 2003
green “making a claim against a fund of monies to be paid by a private defendant.” 3
4 Rogalla v. Christie Clinic, P.C.
illappct · 2003
green “to seek to recover charges incurred as a result of providing medical/hospital services which are the liability of a third party.” 3
5 Bankier v. First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Champaign
illappct · 1992
green “every individual breach of contract between two parties does not amount to a cause of action cognizable under the consumer fraud act.” 3
6 Young v. CHICAGO FED. S & L ASS'N
illappct · 1989
green “i am not making a claim against you; rather, i am making a claim against your bank account.” 3
7 Martis v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co.
illappct · 2009
green “whether someone is a third-party beneficiary depends on the intent of the contracting parties, as evidenced by the contract language. it must appear from the language of the contract that the contract was made for the direct, not merely incidental, benefit of the third person. s…” 3
8 Barry v. St. Mary's Hospital Decatur
illappct · 2016
green “because there is no longer a debt owed to the hospital , liens for it can no longer be maintained.” 3
9 Barry v. St. Mary's Hospital Decatur
illappct · 2016
green “the absence of such a clause is of no import because even without that clause, the provider still has the right to seek a lien pursuant to the lien act.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check