7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Milka.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Milka Anchor | green | “a false exculpatory statement is probative of a defendant's consciousness of guilt.” | 8 |
| 2 | People v. White | green | “circumstantial evidence is proof of certain facts and circumstances from which the trier of fact may infer other connected facts that human experience dictates usually and reasonably follow.” | 6 |
| 3 | People v. Larry | green | “repetition of objectionable questions” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Jura | green | “offered for the limited purpose of showing the course of a police investigation where such testimony is necessary to fully explain the state's case to the trier of fact.” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Jura | green | “statements are not inadmissible hearsay when offered for the limited purpose of showing the course of a police investigation where such testimony is necessary to fully explain the state's case to the trier of fact.” | 3 |
| 6 | People v. Richmond | green | “the occurrence of a crime cannot be established solely by a defendant's uncorroborated confession.” | 3 |
| 7 | People v. Williams | green | “a police officer may testify about conversations with others to show the steps in his investigation so long as this testimony is not used to prove the truth of the matter asserted by these other persons.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.