5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re JP Morgan Chase & Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re JP Morgan Chase & Co. Anchor | green | “logically and reasonably related to the harm or injury for which compensation is being awarded.” | 10 |
| 2 | Pfeffer v. Redstone | green | “duty of disclosure is not an independent duty, but derives from the duties of care and loyalty.” | 8 |
| 3 | Mercier v. Inter-Tel (Delaware), Inc. | green | “specific, recurring, and readily identifiable situations involving potential conflicts of interest where the realities of the decisionmaking context can subtly undermine the decisions of even independent and disinterested directors.” | 4 |
| 4 | In Re Del Monte Foods Co. Shareholders Litigation | green | “the reasonableness standard permits a reviewing court to address inequitable action even when directors may have subjectively believed that they were acting properly.” | 4 |
| 5 | Pfeffer v. Redstone | green | “is not an independent duty, but derives from the duties of care and loyalty.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.