4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re the Detention of LaBelle.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re the Detention of LaBelle Anchor | green | “a factual basis for concluding that the individual is not receiving or would not receive, if released, such care as is essential for their health or safety.” | 11 |
| 2 | In Re the Detention of LaBelle | green | “the individual is unable, because of severe deterioration of mental functioning, to make a rational decision with respect to their need for treatment.” | 10 |
| 3 | In Re The Detention Of L.K. | neutral | “based on the evidence and issues presented to the commissioner.” | 5 |
| 4 | In Re The Detention Of A.f. | green | “regarding witness credibility or the persuasiveness of the evidence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.