2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Alexander v. Sandoval.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alexander v. Sandoval Anchor | green | “the judicial task is to interpret the statute congress has passed to determine whether it displays an intent to create not just a private right but also a private remedy.” | 18 |
| 2 | Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp. | green | “something less than total decontamination may suffice to show abatability” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.