4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Morrissey v. Morrissey.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morrissey v. Morrissey Anchor | green | “is controlled by the equities and circumstances of each particular case” | 9 |
| 2 | DeCabrera v. Cabrera-Rosete | green | “in exercising its discretionary power to award counsel fees, a court should review the financial circumstances of both parties together with all the other circumstances of the case, which may include the relative merit of the parties' positions” | 8 |
| 3 | DeCabrera v. Cabrera-Rosete | green | “review the financial circumstances of both parties together with all the other circumstances of the case, which may include the relative merit of the parties' positions” | 8 |
| 4 | DeCabrera v. Cabrera-Rosete | green | “a court should review the financial circumstances of both parties together with all the other circumstances of the case, which may include the relative merit of the parties' positions” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.