4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bank One, N.A. v. Euro-Alamo Investments, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bank One, N.A. v. Euro-Alamo Investments, Inc. Anchor | green | “for the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought.” | 13 |
| 2 | Bank One, N.A. v. Euro-Alamo Investments, Inc. | green | “the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that transfer is appropriate.” | 6 |
| 3 | Action Industries, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. | green | “the determination of 'convenience' turns on a number of private and public interest factors, none of which are given dispositive weight.” | 5 |
| 4 | Bank One, N.A. v. Euro-Alamo Investments, Inc. | green | “the party seeking the transfer must specify clearly . . . the key witnesses to be called and their location and must make a general statement of what their testimony will cover.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.