3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lee Caley v. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lee Caley v. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. Anchor | green | “embodies a liberal federal policy favoring arbitration agreements.” | 18 |
| 2 | Lee Caley v. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. | green | “state law generally governs whether an enforceable contract or agreement to arbitrate exists.” | 7 |
| 3 | Roberto Basulto v. Hialeah Automotive, etc. | green | “the central question with respect to the procedural component of unconscionability 'is whether the complaining party lacked a meaningful choice when entering into the contract.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.