6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Saine v. Clark.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saine v. Clark Anchor | green | “a party seeking specific performance of a contract must show substantial compliance with his part of the agreement, and the breach of a material condition will bar a decree of specific performance.” | 6 |
| 2 | City of Nephi v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission | green | “merely informing the district court in the statement of facts in its opening brief of the factual basis for the claim” | 5 |
| 3 | McFarland v. Kim | green | “solely for their own account ... without the financial participation of a third party.” | 5 |
| 4 | Ledford v. Smith | green | “the right of first refusal provisions of the operating agreement became moot since dynavision was no longer ... an owner in signature possessing a right of first refusal.” | 5 |
| 5 | Herman & MacLean v. Huddleston | green | “reliance is a causa sine qua non, a type of 'but for' requirement: had the investor known the truth he would not have acted.” | 4 |
| 6 | Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,517 Margaret R. Bruschi v. Ken Brown, Elmco, Inc. | green | “justifiably relied" as the equivalent of” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.