Topic: while the jury may draw reasonable inferences from direct o… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #13747

7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Pamela Jones, Katresa Marie Johnson, Mark J. Scott, Jr..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 United States v. Pamela Jones, Katresa Marie Johnson, Mark J. Scott, Jr. Anchor
ca10 · 1995
green “while the jury may draw reasonable inferences from direct or circumstantial evidence, an inference must be more than speculation and conjecture to be reasonable, and caution must be taken that the conviction not be obtained by piling inference on inference.” 7
2 United States v. Green
ca10 · 1999
green “the essence of aiding and abetting liability is proof the defendant willfully associated with a criminal venture and sought through some affirmative action to make that venture succeed.” 4
3 United States v. Collins
ca10 · 2009
green “a harmless error is one that does not have a substantial influence on the outcome of the trial; nor does it leave one in grave doubt as to whether it had such effect.” 4
4 United States v. Thornburgh
ca10 · 2011
green “proceeds' means 'profits' for the purpose of the money laundering statute only where an illegal gambling operation is involved.” 4
5 United States v. Lake
ca10 · 2007
green “criminally derived property' means any property constituting, or derived from, proceeds obtained from a criminal offense,” 3
6 United States v. William L. Deloach, Sr.
cadc · 1974
green “the more that this document is challenged the more it emphasizes the importance, and particularly in a fraud case where we have a cooperating individual, of having a document that in one comprehensive format identifies the various kinds of frauds and the patterns.” 3
7 United States v. Felipe Martinez-Nava and Jose Cepeda-Cabada
ca10 · 1988
green “harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check