2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lance Reberger v. Renee Baker.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lance Reberger v. Renee Baker Anchor | green | “allegations . . . are too vague and speculative to invoke the exception to the three-strikes rule.” | 17 |
| 2 | Eddie Young v. T. Peterson | green | “failed to allege sufficient facts to show that he was under an imminent danger of serious physical injury when he lodged his complaint.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.