5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Correa v. Hospital San Francisco.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Correa v. Hospital San Francisco Anchor | green | “emtala does not create a cause of action for medical malpractice.” | 9 |
| 2 | del Carmen Guadalupe v. Negron-Agosto | green | “by its terms, emtala is designed to assure that any person visiting a covered hospital's emergency room is screened for an emergency medical condition and is stabilized if such condition exists” | 6 |
| 3 | Reynolds v. Mainegeneral Health | green | “created a remedy for patients in certain contexts in which a claim under state medical malpractice law was not available.” | 5 |
| 4 | Reynolds v. Mainegeneral Health | green | “at a minimum congress manifested an intent that all patients be treated fairly” | 4 |
| 5 | Reynolds v. Mainegeneral Health | green | “is a limited anti-dumping statute, not a federal malpractice statute.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.