3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Krystal Goins v. Carolyn Colvin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Krystal Goins v. Carolyn Colvin Anchor | green | “fatally, the administrative law judge failed to submit that mri to medical scrutiny, as she should have done since it was new and potentially decisive medical evidence.” | 11 |
| 2 | Rebecca Akin v. Nancy Berryhill | green | “the mri results may corroborate akin's complaints, or they may lend support to the alj's original interpretation, but either way the alj was not qualified to make his own determination without the benefit of an expert opinion.” | 8 |
| 3 | Krystal Goins v. Carolyn Colvin | green | “the administrative law judge failed to submit that mri to medical scrutiny, as she should have done since it was new and potentially decisive medical evidence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.