2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Healy v. Ratta.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Healy v. Ratta Anchor | green | “due regard for the rightful independence of state governments, which should actuate federal courts, requires that they scrupulously confine their own jurisdiction to the precise limits which the statute has defined.” | 17 |
| 2 | Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. Coyne | green | “erisa preemption analysis 'must be guided by respect for the separate spheres of governmental authority preserved in our federalist system.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.