3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Broaddrick v. Executive Office of the President.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Broaddrick v. Executive Office of the President Anchor | green | “agency's affidavits, without pre-summary judgment discovery, if the affidavits are made in good faith and provide reasonably specific detail concerning the methods used to produce the information sought.” | 12 |
| 2 | Scott Armstrong v. Executive Office of the President | green | “district court judges have broad discretion in determining whether in camera review is appropriate.” | 8 |
| 3 | Scott Armstrong v. Executive Office of the President | green | “when agency affidavits in support of a claim of exemption are insufficiently detailed.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.