3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Murrell v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Murrell v. State Anchor | green | “it would be a sad commentary upon the vitality of the judicial process if an accused could render it impotent by his own choice.” | 14 |
| 2 | Slaton v. State | green | “a party cannot assume inconsistent positions in the trial and appellate courts and, as a general rule, will not be permitted to allege an error in the trial court proceedings which was invited by him or was a natural consequence of his own actions.” | 9 |
| 3 | Rogers v. State | green | “the invited error rule has been applied equally in capital cases and noncapital cases.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.