Topic: specific criminal intent of the accused may be inferred fro… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #14008

6 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Delmarter.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 State v. Delmarter Anchor
wash · 1980
green “specific criminal intent of the accused may be inferred from the conduct where it is plainly indicated as a matter of logical probability.” 10
2 State v. McGee
wash · 1993
green “a statute is ambiguous if it is subject to two or more reasonable interpretations.” 5
3 State v. McGee
wash · 1993
green “if it is subject to two or more reasonable interpretations.” 4
4 State v. Wentz
wash · 2003
green “used for lodging of persons or for carrying on business therein, or for the use, sale or deposit of goods” 3
5 State v. Wentz
wash · 2003
green “a vehicle adapted to the rails of a railroad . . . and used for carrying passengers and mail, baggage, freight, or other things.” 3
6 State v. Wentz
wash · 2003
green “if a person broke into a train's engine car, he could not be charged with first degree burglary, but it would be first degree burglary if he unlawfully entered a cargo car on the same train.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check