7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Campbell v. Monroe County.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Campbell v. Monroe County Anchor | green | “we agree that a florida county may enforce zoning requirements which primarily regulate aesthetic appearances.” | 4 |
| 2 | Metropolitan Dade Cty. v. Section 11 Prop. Corp. | green | “we agree that a florida county may enforce zoning requirements which primarily regulate aesthetic appearances.” | 4 |
| 3 | City of Lake Wales v. Lamar Adv. Ass'n | green | “zoning solely for aesthetic purposes is an idea whose time has come; it is not outside the scope of the police power” | 4 |
| 4 | City of Sunrise v. DCA Homes, Inc. | green | “florida has long recognized that local governments may legislate to protect the appearance of their communities as a legitimate exercise of their inherent police power.” | 4 |
| 5 | Proctor v. City of Coral Springs | green | “unless it is clearly shown that it has no foundation in reason and is a mere arbitrary exercise of power without reference to public health, morals, safety or welfare,” | 4 |
| 6 | Proctor v. City of Coral Springs | green | “the unsightly appearances and diminution of property values that occurred when camper-type vehicles were parked or stored out of doors in residential areas of a community.” | 4 |
| 7 | Henrise v. Horvath | green | “any authority which has recognized a close friendship, without more, as the highly personal or intimate human relationship that is protected by the united states constitution.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.