4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Graham Central Station, Inc. v. Jesus Peña.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Graham Central Station, Inc. v. Jesus Peña Anchor | green | “when a party attacks the legal sufficiency of an adverse finding on an issue on which it did not have the burden of proof, it must demonstrate on appeal that no evidence supports the adverse finding.” | 10 |
| 2 | Ortiz v. Jones | green | “we examine the entire record and consider and weigh all the evidence, both in support of and contrary to the challenged finding.” | 8 |
| 3 | Graham Central Station, Inc. v. Jesus Peña | green | “must demonstrate on appeal that no evidence supports the adverse finding.” | 7 |
| 4 | Republic Petroleum LLC and Republic Petroleum Partners, LP v. Dynamic Offshore Resources NS LLC and W&T Offshore Inc. | green | “only if it is so contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence as to be clearly wrong and unjust.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.